New feature “Stud Farm System" has been released! Build and upgrade different facilities in your farm to improve training effect and unlock speical abilities for. 19 Valuable Horse Racing Betting Systems. Ken OstermanKen The book reviews similar studies by other statisicians and refines their work. This book really. 13 Quick and Simple Horse Racing Systems That Will Get You More Winners. Paul Coleman. Published. ISBN: Kindle Edition. 2 pages.
13 Quick and Simple Horse Racing Systems That Will Get You More WinnersThis is a simple, easy-to-apply horse racing system or strategy. The system works for UK & Irish racing, as well as for horse racing everywhere else in the. New feature “Stud Farm System" has been released! Build and upgrade different facilities in your farm to improve training effect and unlock speical abilities for. our Horse racing betting system is really amazingly simple. make a bit or a lot A Free Horse Racing System!: A Discussion about how the system works.
Simple Horse Racing System That Works Each Way Sniper VideoThree SIMPLE Horse Racing Systems
Auf die dritte Einzahlung erhГlt der Spieler einen 50 Simple Horse Racing System That Works - KaufoptionenWord Wise.
Like this: Like Loading This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged ALWAYS , Horse , Racing , System , Works. Bookmark the permalink.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Email required Address never made public.
Mr WordPress on Hello world! The starting point for this system is the informative quality it possesses, Mel creator of the system is dedicated to investigating everything necessary about a particular horse race, everything about the horse and who will ride it in the race.
It is very important to know every detail of the race and the horse, says Mel, is the fundamental piece to make a winning bet.
Mel Gee is an expert, a man dedicated to offering his followers a way to make money without risk with his horse racing tips.
The knowledge of this man is reflected in each of the tips that the system shares with the subscribers. It is not necessary to have luck, what is needed is intelligence and patience to wait for the best horse races.
Mel takes his time to check each race, he knows where to look for the best information and makes sure his sources are reliable. The horse races that Mel chooses, as he himself says, are the most lucrative horse races.
According to the advice of Mel Gee, it is very important to choose horse races that serve to double the profits in a single race, horse picks with odds superior to 1.
Subscribers will receive tips directly from Mel Gee system creator for use in upcoming horse races. They never tell you about the losses ….
So where do you start with horse racing systems, more importantly, identifying the ones that work? There are a huge number of reasons for this and it is my intention to explore some of these over the course of this article.
Probably the best place to start is with what a horse racing system can entail, as there are so many examples out there that it is difficult to know what you are looking for or at.
In its purest form, a horse racing betting system is any system which is designed to help you, the user, pick horses that have an increased chance of winning, and thus make a profit.
In the main, these will be what are called self selection or mechanical selection meaning that you do the work yourself.
These are systems in which you are given details of what to look for in order to see where a horse has an edge. These are massively varied and I can tell you from experience that they range from very grounded in reality to pure flights of fantasy.
The second type of horse racing systems that you might see is a piece of software. These software based systems are usually built around the same selection process as mechanical selection system.
What do you think the chances are of those systems working? Everybody would just sit in their pyjamas all day gambling for a living.
Does this happen? Nope, of course not, but it does not stop them trying to flog you the latest, rehashed rubbish. And then you have all those sellers on eBay who are trying to flog the latest system, promising riches beyond belief.
I actually do look at such systems sometimes to see if there is anything I can change to make them work. It caught my eye, and sometimes you know, you do find some gems, so I paid for it, and you know what it was?
Increasing your stakes as you did so after every loss. I mean, what an absolute joke. More like a route to bankruptcy.
I mean, how can you resist that? I review many products as most of you already know, and one of my keen interests is definitely gambling, and Betfair, and therefore I place a large emphasis on my website around these two subjects.
There are of course very many systems out there, and many either use software, or are just manual actions when following instructions.
The difference is instead of you having to carry out the work yourself, the software applies the relevant parameters and gives you the outcome.
Obviously this is much quicker than doing it yourself. These are tipster services and training courses. Tipster services are ten a penny and I have more than lost track of how many are out there as there seems to be a few new ones landing in my inbox every week.
With a self selection based system, the pros are arguably more inherent than any other type, namely that you can identify potential winning bets whenever you want to.
Please divulge. IN all the world of handicapping the races we refer to PAST performances but this is missleading since it shows how the horse DID perform not how it will perform.
I bellieve the answer may be use a portfolio type approach to provide greater flexibility! Should the winning sp prices be higher, then i would raise the sample size accordingly to account for the longer losing runs and lower strike rate.
I'm glad you have found the article of use thus far, if you have further input i would be interested to hear it, indeed, if anyone else has. We never stop learning in this game.
As far as betting bank is concerned, again, relative to the possibility of losing run, it should be sufficient to cover one or to of these, and as far as staking?
Well i almost exclusively play single point level stakes. Both are showing profits at Betfair LSP less 5 commission in excess of 30 1 from over bets the other from over bets.
Yet they have suffered longest losing runs of 18 pts and 60 pts respectively so your comments on patience struck a chord with me.
I have other variations on this selection process that is also producing profits but from a far smaller number of bets so I was wondering if you had a view on what number of bets would make a satisfactory sample size to begin betting on the selections and how you would set the betting bank.
At present I wait until I have qualifiers then base my stakes on double the longest losing run at that point adjusting stakes accordingly if the longets losing run is subsequently exceeded.
My systems I prefer to call them selection methods are both showing profits in excess of 30 per cent. Thats what i was trying to say in the above comment.
My most profitable system only backs selections at Betfair SP of From or so bets the longest losing run has been 60 points but with a strike rate of around 9 is it reasonable to expect runs much worse than that and if so how much worse?
As far as sample sizes go Ive had systems that look good over - bets and then start to go wrong thats why Im more cautious now and wait until I have results before betting with real money.
None of the winners have been returned at anything above 28 so its not just down to a few freaky winners at massive prices.
The win rate is over 9 per cent. Long losing runs are always going to happen when betting at big prices. All Im trying to establish is whether a run of much more than 60 points can reasonably be expected but I dont expect you to answer that.
So many systems do actually have a limited period of success. Dont just look at the system you useie tunnel visionbut look at what is happening around in racesanalyse why the results are not forthcoming and adapt if required.
B talks a lot of sense particularly as regards systems. I have been known to seek his adviceand he appears to have a great deal of knowledge and resources to hand with honest opinions.
Good informative blogthanks Marc! It is always marginal, but half the fun is finding them! I figure that if the bookies have got a horse shorter than FC in Racing Post then they also think it has got a good chance of winning.
There are other factors that rule horses out but like you said its best I keep them to myself. Not sure exactly what the percentage is but I believe 50 of winners come from the first five in the betting.
So with that in mind restricting selections in races of 10 or less should keep you getting half the winners - theoretically!
For me to consistently use a system it would need to be nearly completely automated or quick and simple. Time is money and to use a system in affordable amounts is generally underwhelming or not worth the investment and risk.
Im convinced that systems can be hugely profitable and there are plenty of options or niches the less popular the better in many situations.
But many require a lot of analysis have tight margins and always have variability which provides significant risk regardless of the system.
The vast majority are like surfing a shark enjoy it while it lasts. There are certainly many low risk systems trading on market movement or disparity but require a decent size wallet patience and effort.
Most punters didnt get into gambling to make 1 or 2 for a decent amount of effort those people work at insurance companies. Id like access to more statistics and the ability to check certain trends more deeply than I currently can but I have yet to find a way of accessing the information I would like in a way I am happy to spend interpreting.
Personally Id look at lesser known elements of the market and by their nature they are hard to pin down as they are the bits often overlooked by others as well.
Many systems and tipsters want trends and a decent amount of form for it to be statistically significant identifying improvement is a harder area to predict.
But for that reason potentially more rewarding with significant analysis of the limited data while appreciating a reasonably high amount of volatility and risk comes with the territory.
The majority of profitable people in the betting industry make money from being ahead of the market following it is saturated and with small rewards where identified.
And the system entered in about races My question is how can I be sure that my system is EV in a long run?? How many races do I need to feel secure about the system??
The strike rate is about Need some help with this Or not. Watch if the horse is competitive In races what would be reasonable to hit win horses?
From my experience, I can tell you that it is not the bed of roses it may look at this stage. When i say reward i mean emotionally.
Despite having three consecutive years of profit, one singlebad month can decimate a membership list, and regardless of results expect hate mail by the sack load, ridicule from envious people,and even death threats - And this was from giving out profitable information, dont even get started on losing people money.
You never know who you are dealing withm, whilst you have to be as open and honest as the day. Why did i give up my service? Because i came to hate the sport i loved with the pressure of having to provide information and knowing that peoples money was riding on my advice.
I think that is the best part of what systems offer as far as getting rich be it quick or slow that is not going to happen anytime soon but of course being human we will keep trying to find that little nugget that no one else has discovered that can pick winners and make us wealthy and no harm in that its a fun pastime providing we are sensible and systems help us stay sensible help us manage our outgoings help us keep track of how we use our stake money.
Much of the criteria for selecting is static except for the price which fluctuates. This is problematic in that I need to be on if the selection is in the first three in the betting.
If it drifts out its not a bet. Frustratingly Ive watched to potential bets win at and recently. Cheesed off yet again as a shot won on Saturday after drifting to joint-fifth fav.
Therefore I was not on. With this mental beating I am taking at the moment have stripped back the criteria for my systems rebuilt them and in the prosess added three more.
The only thing that can change now is the going with rregards to it being a bet or not. Tested all systems which actually combine to make one single system for and and all years showed profit.
Even is showing profit so I am hopeful. If I hadnt been keeping records which I can refer back to to keep me disciplined and giving hope to continue I may well have quit by now.
You see when Royal Ascot started I had a lot more bets and consiquently a lot more losers. Past records had indicated since that the longest string of losers was 27 achieved twice since then and a further 18 occasions when the losing runs varied between 26 and Between the 13th and the 20th of June I had run up a sole destroying run of 42 consecutive losers - enough to put 99 of people off.
However I have persevered with things. Im trying to illustrate here the importance of keeping records of all bets. Hope this gives some encouragement to anyone enduring a lengthy losing run.
Even though I bet using Betfair SP for higher returns all the results and future bets are worked out on my spreadsheet at Industry SP at level stakes but I wondered how I was going to progress - i.
I thus hit on the idea of gradually increasing after a losing day Theoretically on paper I started the year with all qualifiers on day one carrying one pound There was only one qualifier and it lost so I upped my stakes for all qualifiers on day two to one pound and 10 pence There were three bets with one winner and a small profit of 83 pence